See here for the splice site consensus in Arabidopsis

Dotlet

Dotlet can handle DNA - DNA comparisons using also the reverse complement (here)!

.

Comparison of nucleotide sequence with introns vs. protein sequence it codes.

in Dotlet:

exons in dotlet

.

Using BLAST:

finding exons using blast

How do low complexity regions look in Dotlet?

Repetitive proteins in Dotlet

How many repeats do you identify when you compare the Methanopyrus sequence against itself?

repetitive domains

Dot matrix comparison:

dotmatrix1

dotmatrix 2

 

 

Same with the filter for low complexity turned on:

dot matrix 3 .

.

If you need more information on Dotlet and Dot plots, see the reading materials on HuskyCT, the dot plot entry in Wikipedia, and the dotlet example pages

.

Assignment for today:

        Decide who is right in this discussion:

 

 

Slides on introns

Introns and Their Evolution

 


Three groups of introns based on their splicing mechanisms:

group I and II are self-splicing [have different splicing mechanism: see this figure for comparison of splicing]:
BOOK2


group III introns are present in eukaryotic nucleus, need spliceosomes to splice out:

BOOK

Where different groups of introns occur?

  • Group I: were discovered in ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena; found also in Physarum, fungal and algal mitochondria and phage T4, rare in Bacteria, one is present in Thermotoga 23SrRNA, SImilar to inteins, they often rely on Homing endonucleases to invade a host gene.
  • Group II: common in Bacteria, and so far found only in one Archaeal genus, Methanosarcina
  • Spliceosomal Introns: present throughout eukaryotes, but more common in "crown-group" eukaryotes

Where do spliceosomal introns come from and how the splicing machinery evolved?

Hypothesis:

Spliceosomal introns evolved from Class II introns; the function of some of the internal loops of the class II introns are taken over by the spliceosomal snRNA (small nuclear RNA).

Support:

Gratuitous complexity hypothesis for evolution of spliceosomal machinery: See reading assignment on WebCT [the portions for the reading are highlighted in the PDF file]

Problem:
class II introns are found in bacteria, and only in one Archaeal genus, Methanosarcina; why is it that predominately "crown-group" eukaryotes have introns?

Not much of a splice site consensus (exon1 GT-intron-AT exon2, see here for the splice site consensus in Arabidopsis)

Group I introns often have homing endonucleases.
Homing endonucleases and intron mobility. Spread in populations, selective pressure on endonuclease. See the excellent paper by Goddard and Burt on the reinvasion cycle.

Also: reverse splicing

Possible benefits of having introns:

Exon shuffling, alternative splicing (1 gene -> different protein products) ....

Two rival hypotheses: Intron Early vs. Intron Late

Intron early:

Protein diversity arose in analogy to exon shuffling in the generation of antibody diversity (see your biochemistry or genetics textbook on the maturation of the immune system).

Claims:

Intron late:

Present day introns are late invaders of already functional genes. Exon shuffling might play some role in eukaryotes, but most of protein diversity arose before introns invaded protein coding genes.

Claims:
  • distribution of introns mapped on phylogenetic trees unambiguously points towards late invasion (and here).
  • The correlation between structure and intron position is not unambiguous.
  • The finding that introns in mitochondrial (eubacterial) and nucleocytoplasmic genes have introns in the same location could reflect a preferred intron integration site. The phase pattern is also observed in vertebrate genes, in which the introns are of late origin.
  • Exon shuffling requires introns located in the same phase, but there might be other reasons for having a slight excess of introns in the same phase. For introns to frequently invade genes, there needs to be mechanisms for introns to find new "homes" (see above).

Compromise:

mixed model of intron evolution
  • version 1 - while some introns are recent, most are old. E.g.: [Roy, 2003].
  • version 2 - while most introns are recent, some are older, but not necessarily very old. E.g.: [Rogozin et al., 2003]

Else:

it was suggested that class II introns were the reason for the separation between transcription and translation in Eukaryotes (accomplished through the nuclear envelope). Martin and Koonin's hypothesis suggests that class 2 introns were brought into the eukaryotic cell by the mitochondrial endosymbiont.

 

Same or different tree?

Slides on phylogenetic reconstruction